Talking of the 380Z...
ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk
Tue Jul 5 14:13:14 CDT 2005
> On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 01:09 +0100, Tony Duell wrote:
> > > Not me yet... more interested in their SASI controller at this stage to
> > > be honest as I really need a way of getting the 380Z fileserver backed
> > > up!
> > What about hacking around with the Acorn SASI controller, e.g. the one in
> > your ACW? I assume you have schematics, etc for that.
> Yep, could do - plus I've got the schematics for the Torch one
> somewhere. Just wanted to check that there wasn't anything funny about
IIRC Torch made a SCSI controller for the Beeb, it was used with a ROM
called SCISFS. If you've found one of those you're very lucky, I am told
that fewer than 100 were made.
> the RML one (there shouldn't be) - SASI should be SASI no matter what.
IIRC the RML hard disk unit used a standard ST506-interfaced drive and a
standard bridgeboard to SASI (Xebec?) In which case the host adapter is
going to be pretty normal too.
> > [PROMS]
> > I'll send you a uuencoded tar.gz file of the ones in my machine (CPU, RAM
> > expansion, 40 column video, hi-res). May be a start.
> Brilliant - ta muchly for that. I'll see if I can work my programmer out
> and read the others that I have...
>From what I remember there are no PROMs on the standard (non-intellegent)
disk controller or on the PIO card that I have somewhere. The latter is a
board with an address decoder, 3 Z80-PIOs and a Z80-CTC on it, along with
a wire-wrap area. I don't have schematics, but it would be trivial to
> > > "COS checks to see if there is a VDU plugged into the SIO-4 socket. If
> > What does it look for? One of the handshake lines being asseted?
> Doesn't say, unfortunately. I actually think that RML started out with
> the best intentions when producing their documents and wanted to
> document everything - with the result being that time constraints meant
To be fair, the RML docs are an order-of-magnitude about the crap you get
with modern computer products.
It should be piossible to work out what COS looks for from the source
listings. I am not sure, though, if the version on vt100.net is recent
enough to support this. It's a pity nobody has the COS 3.4 or COS 4.0
> > Personally, I'd try to use the RML's video card for everything, which
> > means kludging up a keyboard. It can't be that hard, the interface is as
> > simple as it gets.
> Yep, true. I'll have to have a look inside one of the Cifer keyboards
> sometime as they look the part - maybe one of those can be hooked up via
> an interface...
I still wonder if the PC keyboard interface would be a good idea. It
would have an adantage to you that the public at Bletchley could bash
away on a PC keyboard without risking anything too rare.
More information about the cctalk