PDP-8s and -10s
aek at bitsavers.org
Wed Jun 15 07:55:56 CDT 2005
>>DEC through the 'golden age' didn't go after that market. They tried
>>target scientific rather than corporate computing.
>One of the oddities is that the 36bit machines the 10s/20s were well
>known for their timesharing with huge nubers of users.
And they did put effort into front-end terminal concentrators on the
models of those systems.
TOPS-10 had a significant influence on the user interfaces of some of
smaller operating systems (RT-11 and RSTS for example), as well as CP/M.
Google for discussions on alt.sys.pdp10 for why this wasn't true for
RSX and VMS.
I suspect that the driving force for tools (esp in TOPS-10) inside DEC
because much of the software development inside of DEC for other CPU
they converted to VAXen was done using cross-development tools on their
timesharing systems (MACY11, etc.) and because 10's were THE machines
to have in
universities (MIT, CMU, etc, etc) if you wanted something that had a
lot of good
tools for a moderate amount of money.
More information about the cctalk