Minix

Allison ajp166 at bellatlantic.net
Wed Nov 16 19:44:05 CST 2005


>
>Subject: Re: Minix
>   From: Scott Stevens <chenmel at earthlink.net>
>   Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 20:16:12 -0500
>     To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 00:38:07 +0000 (GMT)
>ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell) wrote:
>
>> > That is exactly why I did not buy the 3 ed.  Minux has been re-wrtten 
>> > from a 8088 to a 386+
>> > in the 3rd ed. 8 meg of ram min is needed, 16  recomended. I was buying 
>> 
>> BLETCH!!!
>> 
>> That means it wouldn't run on this PC (too little RAM), for all I am 
>> running an old version of linux with no problems.
>> 
>> The reason I bought Minix in the beginning was that it would run on my 
>> PC/XT machine (the only PC I had at the time). And I learnt a fair bit 
>> about OSes and enough C to be dangerous by playing about with it.
>> 
>> 8MB and a 386 is not a small machine!
>> 
>
>It is small for any 'modern' version of Linux.  Most 'distros' now are being built with compile options that don't even allow it to run on a regular 386.  There isn't the same problem for Net or OpenBSD.  Probably one of the reasons I like the BSDs more than Linux:  the fact that they support as 'equal' all those old architectures 'keeps them honest' and keeps the install system from by default installing a horrendous amount of bloat.  I have the same basic compliment of binaries, built from the same source tree, on a little old Sparc IPX and on a Pentium III system.
>
>Early versions of Linux are reaching the age where they are 'technically' on topic here.


FYI: third edition is actually a very recent release maybe a few months old.
Since it's on line and all older version ar still available and the license is
far more relaxed than before.


Allison



More information about the cctalk mailing list