ajp166 at bellatlantic.net
Wed Nov 16 19:44:05 CST 2005
>Subject: Re: Minix
> From: Scott Stevens <chenmel at earthlink.net>
> Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 20:16:12 -0500
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 00:38:07 +0000 (GMT)
>ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell) wrote:
>> > That is exactly why I did not buy the 3 ed. Minux has been re-wrtten
>> > from a 8088 to a 386+
>> > in the 3rd ed. 8 meg of ram min is needed, 16 recomended. I was buying
>> That means it wouldn't run on this PC (too little RAM), for all I am
>> running an old version of linux with no problems.
>> The reason I bought Minix in the beginning was that it would run on my
>> PC/XT machine (the only PC I had at the time). And I learnt a fair bit
>> about OSes and enough C to be dangerous by playing about with it.
>> 8MB and a 386 is not a small machine!
>It is small for any 'modern' version of Linux. Most 'distros' now are being built with compile options that don't even allow it to run on a regular 386. There isn't the same problem for Net or OpenBSD. Probably one of the reasons I like the BSDs more than Linux: the fact that they support as 'equal' all those old architectures 'keeps them honest' and keeps the install system from by default installing a horrendous amount of bloat. I have the same basic compliment of binaries, built from the same source tree, on a little old Sparc IPX and on a Pentium III system.
>Early versions of Linux are reaching the age where they are 'technically' on topic here.
FYI: third edition is actually a very recent release maybe a few months old.
Since it's on line and all older version ar still available and the license is
far more relaxed than before.
More information about the cctalk