Good deals on PC100/133 DIMMs?
Roy J. Tellason
rtellason at verizon.net
Sun Aug 27 22:28:34 CDT 2006
On Sunday 27 August 2006 11:09 pm, Chuck Guzis wrote:
> On 8/27/2006 at 10:54 PM Roy J. Tellason wrote:
> > I could use some - or 128s for that matter, particularly if somebody _is_
> > throwing them away. This box I'm typing through now was being thrown
> > away, and it's faster than anything else I'm running here! Only thing is
> > that it has only the one 256 stick in it, and it'd probalby be happier
> > with more in there.
> Agreed, it's surprising how fast some of the older P1/P2 systems can be
> with enough memory and maybe a nice fast disk controller.
Well, this one's an Athlon 850. :-)
> But beware--some older mobos will not support more than 256MB.
I try to find stuff on the MB if I can, usually.
> Win2K's memory footprint can get to be pretty big (over 100MB) even with no
> applications, so memory helps. Don't overlook WIn98--it can run many
> common 32-bit Windoze apps with much lower memory overhead than 2K or XP.
I don't run any of that stuff here, excepting one box that's got 98 on it
that'll soon be a dual-boot setup.
> OTOH, NetBSD running KDE seems to set a standard for bloat.
KDE is a pig, no doubt about that. Never did get around to trying any of the
BSDs here, I've been pretty happy with Slackware overall.
Member of the toughest, meanest, deadliest, most unrelenting -- and
ablest -- form of life in this section of space, a critter that can
be killed but can't be tamed. --Robert A. Heinlein, "The Puppet Masters"
Information is more dangerous than cannon to a society ruled by lies. --James
More information about the cctalk