Semi-OT: IDE & SATA to USB "dongles"
Roy J. Tellason
rtellason at blazenet.net
Fri Jun 2 19:49:17 CDT 2006
On Friday 02 June 2006 08:17 pm, Brent Hilpert wrote:
> Ethan Dicks wrote:
> > On 6/2/06, Roy J. Tellason <rtellason at blazenet.net> wrote:
> > > Yeah, but that ain't DTL, that's TTL, I still have a bunch of it. I
> > > forget what the DTL numbers were but I think they're up in the 9xxx
> > > range.
> >
> > What about the Motorola 7xx and 8xx parts? DTL or RTL?
> >
> > -ethan
>
> RTL: 7xx, 8xx, 9xx (etc...)
> DTL: 8xx, 9xx, 18xx, 19xx (etc...)
> At the decade level the grouping makes more sense.
There's much of that in my chart at:
http://www.classiccmp.org/rtellason/by-generic-number.html
but I have bunches more data to get, still.
> There were actually lots of other series of SSI RTL/DTL/TTL ICs made in the
> 60s, by both the major manufacturers and smaller players, in addition to
> the various 'standard' series.
I've heard that, in particular that Fairchild had made some early TTL in the
9000 numbers, I think it was? But I seldom run across any of that info at
all, these days, and didn't then. First TTL databook I have goes back to
about 1970, and is a TI book with the standard, H, and L series in it only.
> I received an email request from a fellow in Cuba a year or two ago, asking
> for info about a non-standard TTL-class series of ICs (59xx) made by
> Mitsubishi in the late 60s (I have info about some ICs of the series).
> Apparently the series had been used in the first Cuban minicomputer
> which he had worked on the design of, around 1970.
Mitsubishi? I didn't even know they made TTL. Feel free to pass any info
along and I'll include it in my charts...
--
Member of the toughest, meanest, deadliest, most unrelenting -- and
ablest -- form of life in this section of space, a critter that can
be killed but can't be tamed. --Robert A. Heinlein, "The Puppet Masters"
-
Information is more dangerous than cannon to a society ruled by lies. --James
M Dakin
More information about the cctalk
mailing list