Repair methods (was Cromemco 3101/Beehive B150 score)
Don Y
dgy at DakotaCom.Net
Sun Jun 4 22:57:21 CDT 2006
William Donzelli wrote:
>> I worked on a 100MHz (doesn't sound like much, 30 years later :> )
>> CPU in the mid 70's.
>
> Damn impressive for the 1970s. What CPU?
It was a custom device. I.e. the CPU was fabricated entirely
of discrete ECL chips. The size of a medium sized briefcase.
>> The problems I found were all the *different*
>> ECL families (10K, 100K, MECL III, etc.) plus all the other
>> cruft to interface the real world to them (4000 series CMOS
>> for the JTAG stuff, other level translators for the "fast"
>> stuff).
>
> 10K sucked. MECL III sucked. 100K was the way to go, except for the
> relatively skimpy selection. And never mix...
But you couldn't get "everything" in any given family.
Hence the problems...
>> And, the colossal *power* requirements (>500W for
>> that CPU alone!).
>
> Real computers used real power supplies.
Yeah, I always enjoyed "adjusting" the -Vbb supply -- a
*shunt* regulator fabricated with a whopping big Lambda
power supply driving *BIG* diodes to ground... "select
at test". <shrug> Crude but it *worked*! Power supplies
that big can't descriminate between their load and a dead
short! :-(
More information about the cctalk
mailing list