Gordon JC Pearce
gordon at gjcp.net
Wed Nov 29 08:26:43 CST 2006
Jules Richardson wrote:
> I suppose it's one of those situations where you end up throwing away
> information no matter what (after all, any scan is essentially a digital
> representation of analogue data), but there's a danger of throwing away
> too much data - and for rare docs you might only get the chance to scan
> them once. For rare items I'd rather have maximum quality "just in
> case", even if it does mean more storage space.
Exactly. Storage is incredibly cheap these days. It's easy to throw
disk space at a problem.
If you had to fit all the scans onto RL02 packs, I'd see your problem...
More information about the cctalk