1983 Micro prices (was Re: The Origins of DOS)
Jules Richardson
julesrichardsonuk at yahoo.co.uk
Thu Nov 2 06:01:43 CST 2006
Chris M wrote:
>
> --- Jules Richardson <julesrichardsonuk at yahoo.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
>> ...whilst the impression I've got of the US was that
>> people were far more willing
>> to upgrade systems reasonably frequently to whatever
>> the latest thing
>> available was.
>
> I think the problem with endlessly upgrading an older
> machine was getting support somewhere down that road.
> Software issues come to mind. Older hardware can get
> goofy too, so unless you have an ee degree, it's
> probably often more cost effective to toss the old
> system (for businesses at least). I think the
> disposable pc is alot more of a reality today then in
> the 80's though.
Yep. I certainly get the impression that there was a lot more fault-finding
and fixing going on the the UK than the US, though. People were far more
reluctant to invest money in a machine in the UK unless they could mess around
with it at the hardware level and stand a chance of fixing any problems
themselves (which is probably a reflection on UK society as a whole back then,
rather than being limited to computing)
>> In education, yes. Not so much for home or business
>> use, though. What
>> timeframe are we talking - say 1982 to 1985 or so?
>
> The Nimbus probably came out in o about '85. I don't
> know alot about any of their other products
The other products were far nicer :-) (By calling the Nimbus 'nasty' in my
other post I meant simply to imply that it was rather uninteresting, not that
there was anything particularly horrible about it)
> just that they're still around.
Yes, they're one of the few surviving UK computer companies from the 80s.
Quite possibly the *only* one, although I'm sure someone can come up with
other examples (there are a few brand-names still about, but they've been
through all sorts of takeovers and buy-outs that mean they really don't count :-)
More information about the cctalk
mailing list