VCF Build-It-Yourself Workshops
Allison
ajp166 at bellatlantic.net
Tue Oct 3 06:39:04 CDT 2006
>
>Subject: Re: VCF Build-It-Yourself Workshops
> From: "Chuck Guzis" <cclist at sydex.com>
> Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 15:31:28 -0700
> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
>
>On 10/2/2006 at 2:43 PM David Betz wrote:
>
>>I would *love* to assemble an FPGA kit that allowed me to experiment
>>with various classic architectures (and maybe some modern ones!).
>>Sign me up if you decide to have one!
>
>Golly, folks have been doing this for quite awhile. The XESS kits seem to
>be very popular. There was/is even a fellow who was offering a
>pin-compatible Z80 replacement implemented in FPGA.
>
>Here's one of the lists I've found:
>
>http://members.optusnet.com.au/jekent/FPGA.htm
>
>What's not really clear to me is what the practical difference is between
>implementing a classic CPU in FPGA and writing an emulator for on to run on
>a PeeCee.
That depends on many things. An emulator for a PC might be a microprogrammed
archetecture for a PDP-5 which is a sequential logic machine. With real logic
you have to deal with mudane and annoying things like two registers accessing
a single bus. From my point of view doing a classic in FLGA is convenient
as your not tied ot a PC but it's still more of a software exercise than real
random logic.
>As someone on the list has mentioned, it's really the old peripherals that
>are the interesting bit.
That because you have to interact with the physical world. Often that requires
much more than a bit of logic to fly.
Allison
More information about the cctalk
mailing list