2940 Taxonomy; was: Re: SCSI cable needed
Roger Merchberger
zmerch-cctalk at 30below.com
Wed Sep 27 15:59:34 CDT 2006
Rumor has it that jim stephens may have mentioned these words:
>Jeff Walther wrote:
>
>>>Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:19:55 -0400
>>>From: "Roy J. Tellason" <rtellason at verizon.net>
>>
>good summary Jeff. I cant see anything you got wrong, but might
>clarify that there are two terms in the naming of these boards and
>others that need to be mentioned.
>
>the W stands for Wide, or 16 bit, or 68 pin connectors. It is true
>that you can have W with SCA type 80 pin connectors as well.
>
>the U stands for Ultra Scsi which is the 40 mb/sec or greater.
Erm, not quite. Ultra *can* be 20MByte/sec - if it's a narrow (8-bit) buss.
I've had a few Ultra drives that were only 50-pin.
>Scsi orignally was 5mb/sec. then it was doubled by doing
>what was originally called synchronous mode to 10mb / sec.
=-= A couple of skipped steps in the history... =-=
Then, IIRC, Ultra and wide came out at about the same time, each supplying
20MByte/Sec - Ultra by increasing the bandwidth, Wide by increasing the
busswidth.
Then someone got smart, and stuck 'em together for Ultra Wide, and that
gave us 40Meg/Sec.
>then ultra 2 came out and went to 80 m / sec. I found a
>page that was out in 1988 announcing the Adaptec products
>coming which was the AHA-2940U2W which had the
>dual channel chips and U2 transfer rate. That is probably
>the double 68 pin internal board you are speaking of.
>
>It claimed that the U2W board also supported LVD
>
>The latest transfer rate is Ultra 160. I don't have any
>info on those drives.
Ah, no. The latest transfer rate is Ultra 320 - it's been out for at least
a few years now.
>I think the 80 pin SCA is only a matter of the hot plug
>spec and connector, and can be dealt with by adapters
>from the 50 pin or 68 pin cables to the SCA back
>plane connectors. It also deals with the device address
>in the connector.
Although there are 50-pin to 80-pin adapters, remember that 50-pin is only
an 8-bit-wide bus and so your throughput would not be any faster than with
an 8-bit-wide device (of the same bandwidth).
Hope this helps,
Roger "Merch" Merchberger
--
Roger "Merch" Merchberger | A new truth in advertising slogan
SysAdmin, Iceberg Computers | for MicroSoft: "We're not the oxy...
zmerch at 30below.com | ...in oxymoron!"
More information about the cctalk
mailing list