transputer internals (was Re: Pentium for Non-PC)

Ram Meenakshisundaram RMeenaks at olf.com
Fri Sep 1 14:15:06 CDT 2006


I really shouldn't be doing this, but if you go to http://www.classiccmp.org/transputer/software, you can find tons of goodies including the aforementioned compilers.  ST just really doesn't care about it though...
 
There are some other instruction sets that are out there, but I cant think of them at the moment.  That's strange, but thanks for pointing it out...
 
Cheers,
 
Ram

________________________________

From: cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org on behalf of Alexey Toptygin
Sent: Fri 9/1/2006 3:10 PM
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: RE: transputer internals (was Re: Pentium for Non-PC)



On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Ram Meenakshisundaram wrote:

> On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Alexey Toptygin wrote:
>> Really? I've read my copy of "Transputer Instruction Set: A Compiler
>> Writer's Guide" cover to cover, and I don't recall such an instruction.
>> I think there's one that lets you load the address of the bottom of
>> on-chip RAM, but that won't distinguish the other features...
>
> Its undocumented...
> Its lddevid.  Look at the startup code (bootstrap) in the C compiler
> and/or OCCAM compiler to see how it is used...

<groan> I hope there aren't a lot of undocumented instructions. You'd
think the instruction set reference would tell you about the instructions
used by the vendor's own compiler...

When you say C Compiler and OCCAM compiler, do you mean the "SGS-Thomson
Transputer ANSI C Toolset" and "SGS-Thomson Transputer Occam 2.1 Toolset"
you've got product info for on your page? I don't have either of those
(or any others for that matter), could I get a copy from you?

BTW, your mailer seems to add an extra copy of cctalk@ to the To: field
every time you reply.

                        Alexey




More information about the cctalk mailing list