Nixies, was Re: Octal
Tony Duell
ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk
Mon Sep 4 18:12:29 CDT 2006
> > I would seriously recomend against rectifying the mains for something
> > like this. Non-isolated PSUs have the nasty habit of making things live
> > that you least expect, and may kill you (or worse, damage a classic
> > computer).
>
> Oh, I wasn't suggesting that, simply pointing out that once you got your
> isolation a simple rectifier would do the trick just fine...
Depends on the turns ratio of the transformers...
>
> I've had my experiences with non-isolated equipment, more than I ever wanted,
> and don't plan to build any to add to that. :-)
Me too. I grew up fixing series-string radios and TVs (until the coming
of 'baseband' audio and video sockets, such as the SCART connector, most
TVs sold in the UK, even semiconductor-based ones, had a live chassis). I
don't much care for working on such units.
What amazes me is that in the 1950s and 1960s, UK magazines published
several educational courses. Typically you'd start by building a crystal
set, then turn it into a 1-valver (leaky grid detector), then add audio
stages, RF stages, and maybe end up with a superhet.
Thing is, you got the HT (B+) by half-wave rectifying the mains. The
exposed metal chasis was connected to mains neutral. And you had
headphones. You know, that could easily turn into an electric chair...
>
> > If you use back-to-back transformers as I've suggsted, the actual voltage
> > got get out depends on the turns rations, of course. Maybe a simple
> > rectifier will be enough, maybe you need a doubler.
>
> Many suggestions that I've seen illustrated like that suggest using two
> identical transformers, which should get you the same thing out as you put
> in.
YEs, but there's no _requirement_ to do that.
-tony
More information about the cctalk
mailing list