Slightly OT: Old CRT displays vs. new LCD
Roy J. Tellason
rtellason at verizon.net
Sun Dec 2 17:41:36 CST 2007
On Sunday 02 December 2007 17:23, Chuck Guzis wrote:
> I was just doing some work on my Beige G3 attached to an HP 98789A
> 17" monitor sitting next to a PC with a brand-new wide-screen LCD and
> a NVidia DVI-output AGP card.
>
> What struck me was how smooth the color rendition was with the CRT (I
> think it's a Sony under the HP badge) compared to the LCD. Sure, the
> LCD has more pixels and is very sharp, but the HP analog tube seems
> to be much more pleasing to the eye.
>
> Am I imagining this or have others noticed the same thing? Is this
> another case of vinyl-vs-CD? I don't own an LCD TV and after this
> experience am not tempted to get one.
>
> I figure this is fair game for the list, as the G3 is over 10 years
> old and the HP monitor much older than that.
I dunno but I've been staring at this laptop screen for a number of months
now, while I search for which box has the boards that were in my workstation
that I need to rebuild.
I expect I'll get that round tuit one of these days and then I'll have a
side-by-side comparison as well.
This is my first extensive use of other than a monitor, so it should be
interesting going back again.
I do know that Sony stuff does seem to work very nicely overall. I have a tv
in the room here that I brought with me when I left NYC -- back in 1978! The
tube is a bit worse for wear, but it mostly works just fine.
--
Member of the toughest, meanest, deadliest, most unrelenting -- and
ablest -- form of life in this section of space, a critter that can
be killed but can't be tamed. --Robert A. Heinlein, "The Puppet Masters"
-
Information is more dangerous than cannon to a society ruled by lies. --James
M Dakin
More information about the cctalk
mailing list