Slightly OT: Old CRT displays vs. new LCD
Doc Shipley
doc at mdrconsult.com
Mon Dec 3 06:20:08 CST 2007
Angel Martin Alganza wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 11:34:31PM -0500, der Mouse wrote:
>
>> However, when restricted to the price ranges I can afford, LCDs beat
>> CRTs all hollow.
>
> And, what about power consumption? Is it worth to change for it? I
> use to have a couple of monitors powered on most of the time (they are
> not the main box, but they show some quotations and other data). What
> monitors would you recommend? (I'm interested in using as less power
> as possible over anything else, included image quality).
My SGI GDM-5011's thermal output was rated at something like 800
BTU/hr max, 550 BTU/hr typical. The Dell 2007FP I run now is rated at
256 max and 188 typical. I don't have the power consumption specs
available for the SGI tube, but just the thermal budget translates to a
LOT of savings.
Rated screen size, color-depth, and resolution are pretty close to
identical, but the Dell is a better picture and the GDM-5011 didn't have
S-video, composite, analog, and DVI inputs, or pic-in-pic screen.
Doc
More information about the cctalk
mailing list