Homebrew Drum Computer
Allison
ajp166 at bellatlantic.net
Fri Dec 14 12:41:52 CST 2007
>
>Subject: Re: Homebrew Drum Computer
> From: Gordon JC Pearce <gordonjcp at gjcp.net>
> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:42:34 +0000
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>On Friday 14 December 2007 14:19:06 Jules Richardson wrote:
>
>> Very interesting project. Won't standard tape heads only work reliably if
>> the magnetic material's passing by at quite a narrow range of speeds,
>> though? Google suggests that's 1 7/8" per second, which isn't very fast at
>> all - a drum that can do a few tens of RPM seems possible, but 6000??
>
>I don't think it makes a difference. The higher the speed, the larger the
>voltage from the flux transition, but that shouldn't be a problem (within
>reason). The head gap and medium speed dictates the "resolution" of the
>system. You can think of it as being like trying to write with different
>sizes of pen nib.
>
>Look at reel-to-reel audio recorders - they may run at a variety of speeds,
>giving a tradeoff between audio quality and recording time. You can use a
>higher flux density with a larger head gap (and a correspondingly larger
>drive signal), but you need to haul the tape through faster to maintain the
>bandwidth.
However the inductance of the head windings are a significant factor in
how high you can go for bandwidth.
>On playback, you get the problem that higher frequencies produce a higher
>voltage, hence the need for equalisation (not unlike the RIAA curve for
>magnetic record pickups).
>
>In this case you probably just want to detect the presence or absence (or
>possibly polarity) of a pulse. Equalisation won't be a worry.
At low bit densities it's not an issue otherwise you get into peak shift.
Low being around 300FCPI (Flux Changes Per Inch) based on testing I did
30 years ago. I was using the best ferrite heads I could get my hands on
from top of the line analog casette decks. Those heads were very limited
and heads from 1/4" machines performed far better and still limited me
to under 600FCPI at 15ips (~4800 bits sec) for NRZI and I could hit 9.6k
using phase encoding. Most audio heads are not so hot for saturation
work.
Allison
>Gordon
More information about the cctalk
mailing list