Source code cross referencing tools?

Lyle Bickley lbickley at bickleywest.com
Tue Jul 31 01:14:35 CDT 2007


On Monday 30 July 2007 21:19, Guy Sotomayor wrote:

I'm 100% with Guy on this... See my comments after his...

--snip--

> If you want to talk about classic computers, then this is the list for
> that.  If it isn't...go someplace else.  I'm sick and tired of the
> endless chatter about random crap that has absolutely nothing to do with
> classic computers.
>
> This list has degenerated into almost complete noise.  I belong to many
> lists (and some of them are *very* high volume) and *none* of them fails
> to stay on topic.  This is the only list I'm on where people can't seem
> to stay on topic.  I'm beginning to think that this list isn't worth the
> time I have to spend deleting posts that have absolutely nothing to do
> with the list charter.

[This is a portion of an email I sent to Jay yesterday]

After a long time being on this list, I'm about to leave it. I find myself 
deleting about 90-95% of the messages that are posted.

At one time, it felt like it was a list for folks wanting to chat about 
vintage computers. But over time, it has become a list where just about 
anything goes.

I know it's not your fault, Jay. For some reason, this list seems to be 
unmanageable. I belong to many lists - most are not managed (or one would 
more properly say "self managed"). None of these lists "stray" from their 
stated purpose as does this list.

Suggestion: Split the CCLIST into two or maybe three lists - One list for 
those who what do discuss vintage minicomputers, one for vintage 
microcomputers and one for anything classic electronic (what is now posted as 
"off-topic"). Define vintage as being at least 15 years old and classic being 
at least 10 years old.

It seems to me that "self-managing" of the lists would be easier - as members 
would suggest that a certain subject belongs on another list within the same 
"family" of lists.

I suppose one could argue that some "cross-fertilization" would be lost. But I 
think there is more danger that those of us with a great deal of experience 
in minis and micros [and restoration] will abandon the list if something 
doesn't happen to encourage people to stay on topic.

Regards,
Lyle

>
> Richard A. Cini wrote:
> > All:
> >
> >     Does anyone know of a tool that will take an arbitrary list of source
> > files (say C) and cross reference the variables and routines among the
> > source files? Here¹s the problem. I¹m trying to adapt and extract a small
> > portion of a large project for a smaller project. The header files spider
> > all over the place and the code calls functions in several modules. In
> > all, there¹s several hundred of source files in the large project and I
> > think I¹ll probably need fragments of about 15 of them.
> >
> >     Does this make sense to anyone? I want to take the source file I¹m
> > interested in and find out where the variables and functions are declared
> > in other modules.
> >
> > Rich
> >
> > --
> > Rich Cini
> > Collector of Classic Computers
> > Build Master and lead engineer, Altair32 Emulator
> > http://www.altair32.com
> > http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp

-- 
Lyle Bickley
Bickley Consulting West Inc.
Mountain View, CA
http://bickleywest.com

"Black holes are where God is dividing by zero"



More information about the cctalk mailing list