"You Won't Believe Who Wins"

David Greelish dgreelish at mac.com
Sat Jun 2 11:31:10 CDT 2007


Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 20:52:43 -0400
> From: Sridhar Ayengar <ploopster at gmail.com>
>
> Jim Leonard wrote:
>> Cameron Kaiser wrote:
>>> This is a fascinating, if somewhat qualitative, comparison of user
>>> interface and functionality of a Mac Plus and an AMD dual core.
>>> Presented without further commentary.
>>>
>>> http://hubpages.com/hub/ 
>>> _86_Mac_Plus_Vs_07_AMD_DualCore_You_Wont_Believe_Who_Wins
>>>
>>
>> A bit skewed, to say the least.  The AMD would have won if it were
>> running a Mac Plus emulator, for example :-)

This is very interesting, and I'm sure true, but they're comparing  
the modern system as a modern system to the older one. The article  
makes a good point in regard to performing these basic office app tasks.

> I have a 2GHz AMD Athlon 64 X2 with 1GB RAM that gets booted into  
> MS-DOS
> 7.1 at least twice a week.  Anyone care to guess the boot time on  
> that?

The only thing is, in DOS, it won't function as a true GUI with true  
GUI apps, so the comparison is moot. How about GeoWorks Ensemble? How  
about Windows XP on a system with no additional "stuff" loaded, like  
anti-virus, etc. It's an interesting article, but just how optimized  
was this system for just office apps. Obviously the Mac Plus didn't  
go online, etc., but I get the point, it was a standard system then,  
compared to a standard system now. Where's the productivity advantage?

Best, David

David Greelish
classiccomputing.com

The Classic Computing Podcast
Home of Computer History Nostalgia

Stan Veit's History of the Personal Computer
Audio Book Podcast




More information about the cctalk mailing list