raster laser?
Steve Stutman
steve at radiorobots.com
Thu Mar 8 20:23:27 CST 2007
Hi,
High BW laser deflection is often done with "Bragg cells". They are
acousto-optic.
You input signals at NN Mc. and the cell essentially changes its
refractive index. As beam shines through, it is deflected.
Not inexpensive. When you design a display for human use, psychopyhsics
very important.
You need to think about energy/unit time, deflection, persistence,
retinal sensitivity, etc.
Many clever people spent their lives working on phosphors.
Sooner or later you get back to Farnsworth and Logie-Baird equivalents.
Back when much of the stuff on this list was new, there was a project
involving 30 Mc. BW laser deflection for writing directly on wafer.
Not sure of current speeds, BW, but bound to be faster.
BR,
Steve
ionder Mouse wrote:
>>Somehow I got subscribed to an optics catalog. This got me to
>>thinking. How hard would it be to cause a laser beam to sweep with
>>the speed and accuracy to be a substitute for a CRT?
>>
>>
>
>Quite easy. Barcode scanners do it regularly in one dimension; you
>just need to add another, much slower, scan in the other dimension....
>
>How hard would it be to do it affordably, safely, etc? That's another
>question. Note that horizontal scan frequences in the high tens of KHz
>are common; you'll have to be scanning something like that fast on the
>"fast" axis. Given (say) a 20-faced mirror spinner (which might be
>good enough, though it might prove not linear enough), a scan rate of
>80KHz (what the display I'm using right now is doing) means this
>thing's RPM would be 80,000 (scans/sec) * 60 (sec/min) / 20 (scans/rev)
>= 240,000. 240K RPM is pretty bleedin' fast! Perhaps you can find a
>video card that can do something like 1024x768 at 20? Most video cards
>are concerned with achieving high, not low, refresh rates....
>
>Does anyone know of any electrically controlled optical deflection
>technology that has sub-microsecond reaction times? I seem to recall
>seeing that some crystals change their refractive index with applied
>voltage; if I'm not misremembering, and if they change fast enough,
>that might do.
>
>I'd actually prefer to use such a thing not as a raster display, but as
>a vector display - hence the interest in electrically deflecting the
>beam. I'd like to play vector videogames on a big white wall - either
>classic games under something like MAME, or my own....
>
>
>
>>The upshot? Take an old terminal with nasty screen burn. Cut off
>>the gun end of the bottle, clean off the old phosphor. Apply new
>>phosphor of some kind, then mount the laser rasteriser where the old
>>gun was.
>>
>>
>
>Neat idea.
>
>
>
>>Projecting raster images on the side of a building would be fun too.
>>
>>
>
>But you'd need to crank the laser intensity way up. Even then it might
>not be usable except at night. :)
>
>/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
>\ / Ribbon Campaign
> X Against HTML mouse at rodents.montreal.qc.ca
>/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
>
>
More information about the cctalk
mailing list