these RTL or what?
ajp166 at bellatlantic.net
Sat Oct 6 17:01:42 CDT 2007
>Subject: Re: these RTL or what?
> From: "William Donzelli" <wdonzelli at gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2007 16:48:07 -0400
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>> >That depends on how tight everything is. Thermal Conduction Module, anyone?
>> At 1ns/ft even the TCMs were not tight/dense enough.
>Have you ever seen a IBM TCM?
Yes, but conductors on substrate are slower depending on substrate used.
They are dense but TCMs still have to talk to other TCMs.
>> Crunching numbers was a part of the task. The other part was moving
>> and handeling data in mass storage and memory. Most of the DEC hardware
>> moved data pretty fast. What was the demise of PDP-10 was simple, megabytes.
>And being six bit machine in an eight bit world...
;) minor thing.
More information about the cctalk