4004 and IC history / was Re: Vintage computer photogallery
RodSmallwood at mail.ediconsulting.co.uk
Mon Oct 15 20:07:28 CDT 2007
I'm sure I saw a development system at DEC for the 4004 running on a PDP-8 circa 1975.
From: cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org [mailto:cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Roy J. Tellason
Sent: 13 October 2007 19:41
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: 4004 and IC history / was Re: Vintage computer photogallery
On Saturday 13 October 2007 05:13, Brent Hilpert wrote:
> Can't remember where I read it, but it seemed plausible for the time
> 4004 was being developed (1970), also that it was compounded by
> management's perceptions that the 4004 was a little business on the
> side and not willing to invest much in it, memory chips still being the focus.
> On the other hand, I wonder what packages the original Busicom designs
> utilised - that Intel would otherwise have been obligated to produce -
> one would expect, or typically, they would be larger. (The 4040 would
> go to a larger package, of course.)
Having heard of the 4004 of course, I know basically nothing about it.
Except that it's the part that was supposed to have started all this... And
the 4040? I've only seen mention of it now and then.
> Perhaps not speed as an issue but you were wired into the small family
> of chips that understood the highly specific machine/bus cycle, at
> least until the 4008/9 came along that broke out the address/data busses.
4008/9? First I've heard of these at all.
Can you give any sort of a general overview of what those parts were all about?
I remember very little about the 8008, it having appeared in that Radio-Electronics article way back when.
I do remember, even after the 8080 article in Popular Electronics came out, not thinking very much of microprocessors for quite a while. They seemed limited, it appeared that you had to really go through a lot to fit your thinking and way of doing things to what they could handle, and it took me quite a while before I got to the point where I got a really good grip on the tradeoffs involved, like low package count, etc. :-)
Member of the toughest, meanest, deadliest, most unrelenting -- and ablest -- form of life in this section of space, a critter that can be killed but can't be tamed. --Robert A. Heinlein, "The Puppet Masters"
Information is more dangerous than cannon to a society ruled by lies. --James M Dakin
More information about the cctalk