4004 and IC history / was Re: Vintage computer photogallery
Brent Hilpert
hilpert at cs.ubc.ca
Sat Oct 13 14:56:47 CDT 2007
"Roy J. Tellason" wrote:
>
> On Saturday 13 October 2007 10:46, dwight elvey wrote:
> > Package size was always a dominating cost and defined many projects.
>
> I've often wondered why it is that 14-pin packages seemed to dominate the
> early parts so much. Why they never offered, for example, a dual 2-input
> gate package instead of the more common quad, or other combinations like
> that. It seemed sometimes that things were altered a bit to fit into those
> 14-pin packages that they wanted to use...
There was a brief period (early-mid 60s) were packaging was as you suggest,
early RTL ICs were in 8 or 10 pin cans and flat-paks with typically two gates
per package. As densities increased there was little point though, when
building systems with hundreds or thousands of gates, 2-gates per package just
increased the package count and the potential wastage of 2 unused gates in a
quad pack just wasn't a concern.
> And I don't lay any claim to having any kind of a clue about what factors
> dominated the economics of things back then. :-)
More information about the cctalk
mailing list