Open source, stand alone, ASCII terminal project
John Floren
slawmaster at gmail.com
Wed Dec 3 15:31:34 CST 2008
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Paul Koning <Paul_Koning at dell.com> wrote:
>>>>>> "Chuck" == Chuck Guzis <cclist at sydex.com> writes:
>
> Chuck> There are inexpensive SMT to through-hole adapters available.
> Chuck> While I wouldn't trust myself to carefully hand-solder a whole
> Chuck> board full of SMT, the adpaters are fairly easy to do.
>
> Soldering SMT by hand (other than BGA of course) is no big deal. It's
> only slightly harder than through-hole. It does require suitable
> tools -- thin solder and a fine tip professional grade soldering
> iron. And it's a good idea to use liquid flux (a lesson I learned
> from a technician friend who used to assemble large SMT based boards
> by hand).
>
> I've assembled boards with 100 or so 0603 caps, and some 60-120 lead
> flatpack packages (0.65 mm pitch) this way. Take a bit of time and
> work carefully. Mine worked the first try.
>
> paul
>
>
It was extremely easy for me to solder dozens of SMT boards on day one
at one of my jobs, even though I had never done SMT before. However,
that was with a wonderful Weller soldering station, extremely good
solder, and flux to slather all over the board. If I were to try it as
Joe Diskpack, with a $15 radio shack soldering iron and the included
solder, I'd probably blob it to hell.
The decision to do SMT depends on your intended consumers. Will they
have a good station and a bottle of flux? If so, do it because SMT is
great. If not, SMT is probably pretty evil.
John
--
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
More information about the cctalk
mailing list