offer - OS/2 for the PDP-11

[madodel]

Fred Cisin wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Jan 2008, madodel wrote:
>> I've been using OS/2 since version 1.3.  I'm fairly well acquainted with
>> its capabilities.  Yes I can be wrong and maybe you saw what you think you
>> saw, but all you have is a story.  Where is your proof other then that you
>> think you saw it was OS/2?   I can't prove a negative, but you should be
>> able to prove that it did happen.
> 
> You're certainly welcome to doubt whether he was right, and/or think that
> he was mistaken.  But we rarely put up a "burden of proof".
> 
>> but never at an OS/2 prompt.  And as I also posted, if the original ATM
>> code programmer had known what they were doing then the program itself
>> should have been set as the shell, so no command prompt should have ever
>> been attainable.
> 
> "IF . . .  had known what they were doing"
> I don't doubt that you could write some extraordinarily robust code.
> 
> But, do you assert that Diebold knows what they are doing?

I can only say that they should and they could, but from what I have read 
on how insecure their voting machines are, I would say that now-a-days they 
have no clue.

Mark


-- 

  From the eComStation Desktop of: Mark Dodel

  Warpstock 2007 - Toronto, Ontario, Canada: http://www.warpstock.org
  Warpstock Europe - Valkenswaard close to Eindhoven, the Netherlands: 
http://www.warpstock.eu


For a choice in the future of personal computing, Join VOICE - 
http://www.os2voice.org

   "The liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the 
growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their 
democratic State itself.   That in it's essence, is Fascism - ownership of 
government by an individual, by a group or by any controlling private 
power." Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Message proposing the Monopoly 
Investigation, 1938