brad at heeltoe.com
Mon Jun 23 12:30:36 CDT 2008
Jim Leonard wrote:
>(OpenSolaris has recently (May 2008) become just as "practical" as Linux
>(minus about 30% of the driver support Linux has) so you might want to
>give the OpenSolaris LiveCD a chance.)
>I am *definitely* using ZFS for long-term archival, as you can be as
good to hear. Do you ever use the "snapshot" functionality for backups?
>However, it is important to never keep all of your eggs in one basket;
I think someone at Google said "keep 3 separate copies". That's what I
do. I actually make copies of my main scsi raid-1 to a spare local sata
raid-1 and then I make offsite tars of that (to Amazon S3).
>I don't agree that you need 64-bit for ZFS. I do agree that you need a
>minimum of 1G total system RAM for it, preferably 2G, since that helps
>offload the cost of the parity/crc checks that keep data consistent and
>ensure that you, the user, never actually *see* any IOs except reading.
mmm. ok. memory is cheap.
One thing I always liked about Solaris was the rock solid SMP. Time for
a new look with zfs. I would think it would run well on the current class
of x86 cpu's.
thanks for the info!
More information about the cctalk