Interesting X terminals
Peter C. Wallace
pcw at mesanet.com
Wed Oct 15 18:47:34 CDT 2008
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008, e.stiebler wrote:
> Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:25:22 -0600
> From: e.stiebler <emu at e-bbes.com>
> Reply-To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
> <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Subject: Re: Interesting X terminals
> Peter C. Wallace wrote:
>> No 34010 in the VT1300, but the VT1200 has one (and X11.3? or maybe even
>> X10 something in ROM)
> You're right. Went to storage and checked. The vt1200 has an 34010 in it, bit
> nothing else (?) as an CPU. Didn't find any vt1300, probably threw them out
> as they were so close to vs1300. Found some forgotten vt2000 and vt2000+. VAX
> based again.
I think the only difference between a VT1300 and a VS1300-SPX is the plastic
VT1300 logo and the missing SCSI disk controller...
More information about the cctalk