Interesting X terminals

Peter C. Wallace pcw at
Wed Oct 15 18:47:34 CDT 2008

On Wed, 15 Oct 2008, e.stiebler wrote:

> Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:25:22 -0600
> From: e.stiebler <emu at>
> Reply-To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
>     <cctalk at>
> To: General Discussion:  On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts <cctalk at>
>     ;
> Subject: Re: Interesting X terminals
> Peter C. Wallace wrote:
>> No 34010 in the VT1300, but the VT1200 has one (and X11.3? or maybe even 
>> X10 something in ROM)
> You're right. Went to storage and checked. The vt1200 has an 34010 in it, bit 
> nothing else (?) as an CPU. Didn't find any vt1300, probably threw them out 
> as they were so close to vs1300. Found some forgotten vt2000 and vt2000+. VAX 
> based again.
> cheers

I think the only difference between a VT1300 and a VS1300-SPX is the plastic 
VT1300 logo and the missing SCSI disk controller...

Peter Wallace

More information about the cctalk mailing list