SCSI to IDE bridges...
als at thangorodrim.de
Thu Sep 25 18:06:51 CDT 2008
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 03:46:03PM -0700, Chuck Guzis wrote:
> On 25 Sep 2008 at 17:31, Jim Leonard wrote:
> > All of this is mitigated by using IBM Microdrives instead of solid-state CF.
> Back to a old query--will a Microdrive stand up to months of
> continuous 24x7 use? My impression was that they were useful only as
> intermittent-use devices.
> It seems that if flash was ready for primetime, the server farm
> operators would jump at the chance to employ them, given that power
> consumption is a *big* expense for them (both for system power and
> the HVAC that's needed).
The advantage of flash is _not_ the power consumption, but something
completely different: latency. Even the fastest SCSI drives have 2 ms
average latency (according to the datasheets). With flash, that latency
goes _waaaayyyy_ down. Which makes it _very_ interesting for high volume
OLTP and other latency bound I/O.
> But they're not jumping, are they?
One word: money.
Flash is still a lot more pricey for the same capacity than spindles.
"Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and
looks like work." -- Thomas A. Edison
More information about the cctalk