Language-specific CPUs was Re: uIEC/SD == AWESOME!
Sridhar Ayengar
ploopster at gmail.com
Thu Jan 1 06:42:14 CST 2009
Chuck Guzis wrote:
> On 31 Dec 2008 at 13:27, Cameron Kaiser wrote:
>
>>> (Interesting question, though - I wonder what a CPU might look like where you
>>> could just throw C source code at it, for instance :)
>> Well, there *was* the AT&T Hobbit:
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AT%26T_Hobbit
>>
>> Not quite that, but still optimized for C, allegedly. Never worked with
>> the architecture myself.
>
> Well, the Burroughs B5000 was purportedly an Algol machine; there
> have been CPU designs to eat UCSD Pascal bytecodes and Java bytecodes
> and there have been various LISP machines. But none, AFAIK, to
> actually lexically parse program text input in hardware. I suppose
> 1401 Autocoder might be in that league, if you consider Autocoder to
> be a "language".
The Timex TM100 chip does BASIC in hardware, but it doesn't parse the
text itself... it requires a tokenized stream.
Peace... Sridhar
More information about the cctalk
mailing list