More broken Apples...

[Chuck Guzis]

On 3 May 2009 at 14:24, Fred Cisin wrote:

> My entire post was about differentiating "easy to use" v "easy to
> learn". The corporate push is for "easy to learn", since they don't
> want a training expense for the digital sweatshop. Apple's marketing
> pushes "easy to learn" while calling it "easy to use". "Easy to use"
> and "easy to learn" may occasionally overlap, but are NOT the same for
> those who are capable of learning.

Or, as one person put it--WYLIWYL - "What you learn is what you 
like".

--Chuck