Largest ST-506 (MFM or RLL) type HDD?
snhirsch at gmail.com
Fri Oct 16 06:40:04 CDT 2009
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009, Chuck Guzis wrote:
> On 14 Oct 2009 at 18:10, Steven Hirsch wrote:
>> IIRC, they required the WD2010 controller due to some limitations of
>> the WD10xx series.
> It was a BIOS software limitation, pure and simple. The "standard"
> INT 13H BIOS interface calls for a 10-sector cylinder number (8 bits
> in CH and 2 "borrowed" bits from the sector number register in CL).
> Some late BIOSes (such as those on the WD1006VSRx) expanded the
> cylinder number by borrowing some bits from the head number in
> register DH.
Hmm. There was a limitation somewhere that the WD20xx series corrected.
Number of heads, perhaps? Or am I confusing things totally?
More information about the cctalk