GET LAMP is here

[Liam Proven]

On 11 August 2010 20:45, Dan Roganti <ragooman at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Tony Duell <ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>
>> You know you've been hardware-hackign too long when all you can think of is
>> the Quine McClusky minimalisation method...
>>
>
>
> and whether  P≠NP    :)

Indeed!

Charlie Stross wrote an excellent short story about this once, called
/Antibodies./ It's on Scribd here:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/23396346/Charles-Stross-Antibodies

After that, it's kind of a *relief* that apparently P<>NP. (Although
also a disappointment.)

OTOH, there are many issues with the proof:
http://science.slashdot.org/story/10/08/11/0239209/Possible-Issues-With-the-P--NP-Proof


-- 
Liam Proven • Profile & links: http://www.google.com/profiles/lproven
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk • GMail/GoogleTalk/Orkut: lproven at gmail.com
Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 • Cell: +44 7939-087884 • Fax: + 44 870-9151419
AIM/Yahoo/Skype: liamproven • MSN: lproven at hotmail.com • ICQ: 73187508