Slashing the letter O (Was: Re: Service bureaus (Was: Tek 4051 firmware listing))
Chuck Guzis
cclist at sydex.com
Thu Dec 16 17:43:25 CST 2010
On 16 Dec 2010 at 14:52, Al Kossow wrote:
> There was an attempt at establishing what can roughly be described as
> an upside down Q for a slashed O. The only example I know of where
> someone used this are in line printer listings from SDS in the late
> 60's. I would have to do some serious digging in magazines to find who
> was pushing this as a standard. They end up looking like misformed
> 8's.
>
> It does terrible things to OCR.
I may even have a few old listings with the "0" hand-adjusted in this
manner for publication.
I think I still might have an old CDC coding form that has "0 = zero
and slashed O = oh" pre-printed on it. I'll have to dig some.
None of this compares with the extreme measure that CDC embarked on
in the late 60's and early 70's--use of OCR-A for all correspondence.
Those ugly, ugly characters--they were on all of the typewriters,
regardless of vendor. Was it square = zero and diamond = oh? I
don't remember, except for hating the blasted font, except for
realizing that there were slight differences in the font between, say
Olivetti and Remington.
OCR-B was much more readable.
--Chuck
More information about the cctalk
mailing list