Voice recognition will never kill the keyboard was: Re: Evolution of the Apple Mouse

Joachim Thiemann joachim.thiemann at gmail.com
Thu Sep 30 21:28:47 CDT 2010


On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 21:49, Alexey Toptygin <alexeyt at freeshell.org> wrote:
> I know many, many people that can type faster than they can talk. And then
> there's programming. When every character matters, and many of them are
> punctuation, speech recoginition (and speech for that matter) falls flat on
> its face. It will never be faster to pronounce:
>
> print join(',', map $_->(), @$closures), "\n" for 1..$num;
>
> than it is to type it. And that's relatively readable; perl lets you code
> with >50% punctuation...

Of course, programming languages these days are designed for typing,
with plenty of special characters to indicate common syntactic
elements.  Try writing code on a typical smartphone qwerty keyboard;
it's a pain because the special characters, seldom used in text
messaging are hard to get to (sometimes only via menu).  Example: the
Kindle...

Thus, programming using voice recognition should have a language
syntax adapted to it, and likely be very annoying to type.  Perhaps
COBOL will see a resurrection ($deity save us all)!

Perhaps a new language can use non-speech vocalisations as syntax
elements.  "Ummmm.." to delimit arguments to functions. A cough to
terminate statements. Clicking the tongue to delimit literals!

print umm...  <click> result <click> umm... a umm.. b umm... d! <cough>

Programmer's cubicles will become very noisy places!

Joe.

-- 
Joachim Thiemann :: http://www.tsp.ece.mcgill.ca/~jthiem



More information about the cctalk mailing list