list issues & status

[Charles Phillips]

anyone really hard core and still uses Elm?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elm_(email_client)
:-)


On Nov 5, 2014, at 2:24 PM, Charles Phillips <charles at uniwho.com> wrote:

> yeah i hear ya….  I’m hard core i still use PINE :)
> 
> 
> 
> On Nov 5, 2014, at 2:12 PM, Todd Goodman <tsg at bonedaddy.net> wrote:
> 
>> * Mike Loewen <mloewen at cpumagic.scol.pa.us> [141105 14:09]:
>>> On Wed, 5 Nov 2014, Chuck Guzis wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 11/05/2014 10:03 AM, Mike Stein wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>> As a reminder to everyone, there is no way currently to just reply to 
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> original poster, and Mr Corlett may be unaware that EVERYONE saw his
>>>>>> reply.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I think when you reply to the original post the sender's address appears
>>>>> in
>>>>> the Original Message section (unless he/she has opted to suppress it), so
>>>>> it's just a quick cut & paste, no?
>>>> 
>>>> I use Thunderbird for cctalk.  Isn't an individual reply just a matter of 
>>>> clicking on the sender's name in the header?
>>> 
>>>    Some of us are using text-based clients like alpine/pine.  On the 
>>> M.A.R.C.H. list, when I want to issue a private reply, I have to edit the 
>>> To: line which quotes the original sender's address, but will send to the 
>>> list if you leave it, as is.
>> 
>> And some of us use text-based clients like mutt which asks if you want
>> to send to the Reply-To: address(es) if they don't match the From:
>> address.  If I say no it goes to the From: address.
>> 
>> I can always edit any header field I want though.
>> 
>> So it's all MUA specific as someone else said.
>> 
>> Todd
>