Yay, now I need some Osborne boot media!
ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk
Mon Nov 24 12:54:58 CST 2014
> The flamewar about RX02 is based on defining what is meant by the phrase
> "MFM floppy"! Nobody is "wrong", they just aren't recognizing each
> other's definitions. The RX02 is NOT an "FM floppy"; the RX02 is NOT an
> "MFM floppy". It is a hybrid. It took an FM low level format, and
> rewrote the data area of each sector with MFM, resulting in a disk that is
> about 1/3 FM, and 2/3 MFM. In terms of the floppy ITSELF, disks rated for
> FM or rated for MFM should both work, but there might be better
> reliability using the MFM rated disks. AND NOT the 600 Oerstedt "1.2M"
> disks! THOSE might seem to work, but will be blank again before you need
> to reread the disk! BTDT.
If you can make a real DEC RX02 unit do anything useful with a PC type
'1.2M' disk then I feel like saying I will eat one. The RX02 drive. It's a
dual 8" unit...
As I mentioned, there were 3rd party Qbus boards that did RX02 format
using normal 8" drives (SA800 type), Many also supported double-sided
operation (The hooks for that were in the drivers in most DEC OS's, the
DEC RX02 had almost all the electronics for it, other than the 'down' heads).
I suspect that with the right cabling these boards could be used with PC
type HD drives. In which case you _would_ want 600 Oestedt disks,
> And, NO, the 765 can't be tricked into reading RX02.
> Or can it? PROVE ME WRONG - write the code to do it!
I've never heard of it being done. Those 3rd party RX02 compatible
controller boards didn't use a standard FDC IC. They used a
custom controller (often a pair of 2901s, a 2910 and microcode PROMs
plus a lot of extra logic).
More information about the cctalk