DEC MKA11 and/or M8261/M8163
bqt at update.uu.se
Mon Feb 16 10:12:56 CST 2015
On 2015-02-16 09:42, Eric Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 1:23 AM, Paul Birkel <pbirkel at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Ah. I need to count better. There are *two* MKA11 per CPU, thus each only
>> *needs* just a 1 Mw configuration due to address-space limitations.
> I don't think so. The system shown in the photos has four CPUs, and
> four MKA11 boxes. The MKA11 boxes are located in the right half of
> the cabinet housing CPU C, and the left half of the cabinet housing
> CPU D. There's no evidence in the photos of there being any more
> MKA11 boxes other than those. For instance, the right half of the
> cabinet housing CPU B clearly contains no MKA11 boxes, but rather what
> appear to be Unibus expansion boxes. Only one photo shows the the
> right half of the cabinet housing CPU A open, and the view is
> partially obstructed by the CPU being extended out on its rails, but
> it definitely does not appear to have any MKA11 boxes either.
> If each MKA11 box has eight MS11-KE storage array modules (M7984),
> that is 256KW per MKA11, for 1MW total. While that's only just over
> half of the physical memory address space of the CPUs (1920KW, because
> the top 128KW is reserved for the Unibus address space), that seems
> like a very plausible real-world system configuration.
Box 0 and 2 are clearly setup to be interleaved with each other, and
both have a 0 starting address, is is located in the cabinet holding CPC.
I wish I could read out what the thumbwheel switches on box 1 and 3 are
set to in the cabinet holding CPD, as that would tell us how much memory
are in each box.
But I would have expected the boxes to hold close 512KW per box. With
the 128KW modules, that would be easy to reach.
More information about the cctalk