flash (or ide) storage for unibus 11?
cclist at sydex.com
Sat Nov 28 23:23:14 CST 2015
On 11/28/2015 06:57 PM, Fred Cisin wrote:
> WD style: no problem with index pulse timing relative to data NEC765
> style: index pulse is necessary during LLF, but may need to be
> blocked during read/write, although a few of the newest drives may
> not be happy without index.
765/8272 are particularly bad in this respect (they're blind for a full
millisecond or so) in contrast with 765A/8272A, which chopped the blind
spot by half.
In the 8272 days, I added a one-shot to delay the blind spot by a
varying amount, which solved the problem neatly, while still allowing
the index to pass through.
The index is also needed for WD17/27 family controllers also for LLF.
Ya gotta start (and end) somewhere.
If you simply block index with the 765 type FDC, you'll never get a
"sector not found" error--if you have a deadman timer, it'll expire.
More information about the cctalk