The Internet & our hobby
bqt at update.uu.se
Sat Oct 24 01:50:06 CDT 2015
On 2015-10-23 19:06, Noel Chiappa wrote:
> > From: Johnny Billquist
> > not going to try and contradict what you wrote.
> Right, I wasn't meaning to imply what you said was incorrect, just giving a
> little more detail on what was a murky and complicated process.
> > I suspect it's because people now assume that "Internet" was always
> > TCP/IP
> Define "the Internet"! :-) If one describes it as 'the large collection of
> interoperating networks speaking TCP/IP', then that statement _is_ correct!
> If one instead uses a broader definition, something like 'computer networks
> in general' (pulling in things like Usenet), then, no, it's not correct.
Well, it is not correct when we then include that it is 43 years old...
Internets using TCP/IP is a bit over 30 years old, but not over 40.
> I'm _not_ trying to say that there is only one, correct, definition of 'the
> Internet' - but various statements about 'the Internet' may or may not be
> accurate, depending on which definition is used.
Agreed. But the OP was being rather specific.
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
More information about the cctalk