strangest systems I've sent email from
swiftgriggs at gmail.com
Thu Apr 21 11:11:22 CDT 2016
On Thu, 21 Apr 2016, John Willis wrote:
> I think I remember slirp... didn't that somewhat emulate a SLIP link
> through a shell account?
Yes. It was (and kinda still is) awesome. The coolest thing about it is
that, unlike using PPP or SLIP, you don't need valid IPs as endpoints.
Slirp was like a poor mans dynamic one-to-many NAT before there was such a
beast. That was a great thing when you were a college student without any
juice to get an IP from the IT beast that ran the school.
> That's another thing I remember and miss from those days... your average
> ISP would provide NNTP and UNIX shell accounts, as well as a few megs of
> space to put up a personal web site in ~/public_html.
Yep. I miss that too. I used to run such an ISP in the 90's and we did
exactly as you say. We also ran a finger servers everywhere (and no, not
one with a bunch of security problems). People used to use that in cool
ways, too (bots, cool services, vending machine interfaces, etc..).
The simple fact is that most folks are too apathetic and ignorant to care
about such things anymore. The Internet is a large, but still textbook
case of what happens when you let business-weasels in on something good.
They "monetize" it and turn it into a combination strip-mall, casino,
theatre, porn-shop. Of course, the Internet wouldn't be what it is
without said weasels, (certainly not as large) but I think I'd be pretty
okay with that. I'd be okay without 80% of Internet traffic being video,
too. I guess that makes me a curmudgeon (but I've always hated TV and I
resent the forces trying to morph the Internet into on-demand cable
television). Yea yeah, I know I'm just peeing in the wind to say it, but
there it is.
I remember when computers used to come with a programming manual and
schematics for the machine, too. Even mid-level stereo equipment would
often come with schematics. That's because those folks (the generation
before me, I'm a gen-X unit) had a significant population of people who
cared about such things and could run a soldering iron.
Just like there didn't used to be any such thing as Computer Science.
Ie.. you learned electrical engineering (ie.. how the darn chips
themselves worked, first) or some other technical discipline then applied
that to computing. Now, most colleges want to teach you Java and call you
a computer scientist. We get college grads all the time and I'm shocked
to see how little they've actually been taught relating to computing.
They are marginally more useful than high school kids and that's only
because they don't show up quite as late for work.
I'm not saying everything was perfect in the 80's or 90's. I mean, some
CS professors in the 90's were teaching Oberon, LISP dialects, or
Smalltalk. Then if you ever uttered the (completely true) phrase "not
commercially viable" they'd launch into some diatribe about how these
languages taught you some kind of special spiritual meta-programming
that'd ultimately path the path for you to become some kind of code-God
(like them?). That is, as long as you bought their 18th edition $160 book
(only at the college bookstore). So, no, things were never perfect, and
people had to try and do work with Windows for Workgroups 3.11. :-)
Point is, I don't have blinders on, but there are *reasons* why I'm
nostalgic. Just like I'm nostalgic for the days (before my time) when a
person could earn interest on their savings. I'm not saying things were
perfect, but some aspects of the past were definitely better.
More information about the cctalk