High resolution screens are great for typography - Re: Accelerator boards - no future? Bad business?
bfranchuk at jetnet.ab.ca
Mon Apr 25 20:43:26 CDT 2016
On 4/25/2016 6:15 PM, Swift Griggs wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Apr 2016, Toby Thain wrote:
>> Incorrect. Scalable system (& third party) fonts have been with us for
>> more than 30 years, as I said.
> Though you are quite correct, it doesn't mean that scalable fonts are
> everywhere. They might be present more or less everywhere in MacOS and
> maybe even Windows, too. However, there are two problems. One is that it's
> (currently) a big hassle in Windows to get absolutely every font to get
> bigger at once. Trust me, I tried. For example, you might make the title
> bar bigger, but the text underneath button icons might be immutable (and
> thus microscopic). I expect this will change in the future as folks adopt
> Apple's solution where they can sort of interpolate (maybe that's the wrong
> term in this case) the view of what you are seeing. I'm guessing you know
> what I mean. If that happens, I might decide I *love* high res screens.
> What you are saying is fundamentally sound, ie.. more pixels mean more
> detail and readability. It's just the current state of the art that's no
> My other (personal) issue is that I use a lot of oddball operating systems
> that don't have and will never have good support for scalable fonts which
> can easily be adapted for ultra-high-res. So, I just stick with old
> monitors and specialty stuff (like the Samsung 210T).
>> OS X 10.3 shipped with subpixel rendering on LCD as has Windows Cleartype
>> for many years.
> Which is, I agree, great for readability. Now if there was just a universal
> one-stop place to double my font sizes in every OS (or even the same OS)...
Since I am in sour mood today, rain is hampering my cleaning plans ...
The screen looks great, But how does that web page print?
The sour side ... printing.
More information about the cctalk