strangest systems I've sent email from
rwiker at gmail.com
Fri Apr 29 14:13:42 CDT 2016
> On 29 Apr 2016, at 21:10 , Paul Koning <paulkoning at comcast.net> wrote:
>> On Apr 29, 2016, at 3:01 PM, ben <bfranchuk at jetnet.ab.ca> wrote:
>> I liked Forth when it was still threaded.
> Base FORTH is not, in and of itself, threaded. PolyFORTH was if memory serves. Then again, creating a thread scheduler (cooperative scheduler) for FORTH is just a modest exercise for the programmer.
I'm guessing Ben means threaded as in "Threaded Interpretative Language", and not a concurrent programming language.
There are still plenty of Forth implementations based on threading (of words).
More information about the cctalk