Spam [was Re: still looking for that stuff?]
dave.g4ugm at gmail.com
Fri Aug 12 01:26:09 CDT 2016
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Fred
> Sent: 11 August 2016 16:38
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
> <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Subject: Re: Spam [was Re: still looking for that stuff?]
> On Thu, 11 Aug 2016, geneb wrote:
> > I think it would be more effective to stuff the spammer into a Brazen
> > Bull and then force his children/family members to light the fire.
> > Televise it across all media outlets. Spam should slow to a tiny,
> > tiny, trickle after one or two of these little events...
Firstly, there are many types of unwanted e-mail, and using the term SPAM to
cover them all is a dis-service.
A lot of reported SPAM simply comes from lists folks have signed up to, and
who can't be bothered to un-sign themselves off the list.
The e-mail in question was not one of those, it was almost certainly sent by
a criminal attempting to steal and re-sell some ones credentials.
I am fairly certain the e-mail originated from 18.104.22.168. Sticking that
into an Internet Search engine reports...
IP General Information
IP Address: 22.214.171.124
ISP: Zapbytes Technologies Pvt.
Continent: Asia (AS)
Country: India (IN) IN
Latitude: 28.6667 (28°40'0.12" N), Longitude: 77.2167 (77°13'0.12" N)
> Spam should reduce when word gets around that spammers are being
> tortured to death.
I doubt it, some one will invent a religion that says tortured spammers get
to heaven first......
> Decriminalize spammercide.
> Spread the word - "spammers are already being murdered."
More information about the cctalk