11/73 into 11/03 chassis?

COURYHOUSE at aol.com COURYHOUSE at aol.com
Tue Feb 9 13:18:06 CST 2016

I have an  11/73  card in one of  my video editing  systems...
does this mean I can give my H-11 more balls?
In a message dated 2/9/2016 11:36:30 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time,  
jacob.ritorto at gmail.com writes:

On Tue,  Feb 9, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Noel Chiappa  <jnc at mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
> I'm not  absolutely sure exactly what you have that's holding the '11/03
>  backplane'; if it's a standard BA11-M enclosure, the answer, sadly, is
>  'no'.
> [...]
> If your '11/03 backplane' is a different kind of  backplane, in some other
> kind
> of box (e.g. BA11-N or BA11-S),  the answer, sadly, is still 'no', because
> they
> both also use  terminal blocks for power. (Although if you have a BA11-S,
>  you'd
> already be set, those are Q22 native.)
OK,  now that I know what I'm looking for, my target options here  are:

BA11-N and "OBA11-R" (an expansion  box)

Backplanes currently in these chassis are:
H9273 and  H9273-A

Power supplies are all H786.

> Really, it's not  that hard to upgrade an H9270-A (or the H9273-A in a
> BA11-N)
>  to Q22 (I have done several of the latter); the transplant you speak  of
> (were
> it possible) is on the same order of magnitude of  work.
>          Noel

So, since grafting in the Micro backplane would  involve butcher work, I'm
now wholeheartedly convinced that I should be  moving to your setup with the
BA11-N/S boxes, Noel.  And I'm sold on  the Q-22 backplane conversion
(despite failing the first time I tried it  years ago).  Going to study what
prints I have, review previous advice  and go for it.

Thank you for all the tips and  hand-holding!


More information about the cctalk mailing list