lyndon at orthanc.ca
Sat Jul 2 13:24:16 CDT 2016
> On Jul 2, 2016, at 2:37 AM, Jay West <jwest at classiccmp.org> wrote:
> Of those bounces, almost 100% of them were due to DMARC/DKIM mechanisms. I
> view DMARC/DKIM as less than useless. First, they are far from universally
> implemented - so most valid email is not DMARC/DKIM "protected". Second a
> large percentage of the spam in the world *IS* DMARC/DKIM "protected".
Amen. DMARC is an abomination that must be made to die.
DKIM is useful, in an advisory sense. DMARC just outright breaks decades of standardized email protocol behaviour.
More information about the cctalk