MiST - Amiga ST FPGA + intro
paulkoning at comcast.net
Thu Mar 31 20:03:56 CDT 2016
> On Mar 31, 2016, at 4:39 PM, ben <bfranchuk at jetnet.ab.ca> wrote:
> On 3/31/2016 1:38 PM, ethan at 757.org wrote:
>>> A raspberry pi 2 fits in an even smaller box, and is a lot cheaper...
>> FPGA can be configured to match the original hardware. Pis run Linux and
>> then app on it which makes performence unstable?
> FPGA's can match the TIMING and HARDWARE BUGS better, if given half a chance.
If you have a very good functional specification of a processor, you can build a behavioral model that will execute the same code. But it won't match the bugs (since those probably aren't in the spec) and it certainly won't match the timing.
You can match timing and bugs, but for that you'd need to have access to the original design, at the gate level or close to it. That is occasionally possible (for example, the CDC 6600 design data exists to that level of detail). But it is quite rare to find that. In fact, even a functional spec good enough to do an FPGA behavioral model is rare. Most of the time you find yourself reverse engineering things from vague descriptions, just as emulator software programmers do. The PDP-11 FPGA designs I have seen are examples of this.
More information about the cctalk