michael.99.thompson at gmail.com
Sun Apr 30 08:34:54 CDT 2017
We have lots of dual-trace Hitachi 25MHz analog 'scopes that were donated
by BMI. They are fine for the low speed work that typically do, and don't
have some of the interesting problems that digital 'scopes have. We can get
a deep discount on any of the 'scopes that BMI has:
I was looking at some of the mixed-signal 'scopes like the Rigol MSO1104Z.
Having a 'scope and a logic analyzer in the same instrument, with both
'scope and logic analyzer triggering would be very nice.
On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 10:07 PM, dwight <dkelvey at hotmail.com> wrote:
> If it is your only scope I recommend an analog scope of at least 100 MHz,
> with dual trace and delayed sweep.
> If you already have an analog scope, I recommend a logic analyzer instead
> of a digital scope.
> If you already have both above, I recommend a digital scope.
> *From:* cctech <cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org> on behalf of Michael
> Thompson via cctech <cctech at classiccmp.org>
> *Sent:* Saturday, April 29, 2017 4:15:33 PM
> *To:* allison
> *Cc:* General Discussion: On-Topic Posts
> *Subject:* Re: Oscilloscope Recommendation
> Thanks for the recommendation
> Sent from my iPhone
> > On Apr 29, 2017, at 4:30 PM, allison <allisonportable at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On 04/29/2017 01:28 PM, Michael Thompson via cctech wrote:
> >> The RICM just received $1,000 to buy a new oscilloscope. I would like a
> >> four channel. and color would also be nice. The bandwidth doesn't need
> >> be high because we usually work on ancient equipment.
> >> What would you suggest?
> > I use a RIgol DSO at work to replace a 200mhz Tek with power issues.
> Far better scope.
> > For the money we paid, 4 channels and wide band its very decent. Being
> able to get
> > screen grabs to a USB stick is a big plus.
> > I personally have a Rigol DS815T spec analyser with tracking generator
> and its a good performer.
> > Not up to the standards of a R&S FSH6 but about 1/15th the price.
> > Allison
More information about the cctalk