DS12887 pcb substitute with battery
cctalk at ibm51xx.net
Sun Jan 22 12:20:50 CST 2017
Then why not use a dip compatible version of the DS chip? I mean yes this allows for switchable battery which is very nice but SMT soldering is not for everyone.
I wonder if there is a way to determine if there will be BIOS issues by switching the DS12887?
-------- Original message --------
From: Jon Elson <elson at pico-systems.com>
Date: 1/22/17 9:16 AM (GMT-08:00)
To: General at classiccmp.org, "Discussion at classiccmp.org:On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: DS12887 pcb substitute with battery
On 01/22/2017 10:07 AM, Ali wrote:
> I thought the problem with switching these chips was that part of the ROM code was embedded in them? I.e. it isn't just an issue of battery? Am I wrong? If I am then why not use one of the replacement chips that are available?
These don't have a lot of memory on them. many early PCs
stored some config info there, but generally the BIOS can
reconstruct it if it isn't there. I suppose there is a
possibility that random data in the CMOS memory could cause
the BIOS to try to use unavailable features and hang. I
don't think anybody put actual executable code in there.
More information about the cctalk