elson at pico-systems.com
Wed Jan 31 12:56:26 CST 2018
On 01/31/2018 12:00 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:
> On 01/31/2018 06:00 AM, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
>> Wow, 10 years later, with faster chips, and still the same speed? That's surprising.
> I believe that Honeywell went through a similar exercise at one point.
> An all-ECL redesign (details escape me) resulted in no appreciable
> improvement in performance.
I had a problem with a 16-bit binary counter not having
enough frequency resolution, and looked at using ECL to be
able to double the clock. After much calculating, I found
that there was not a huge improvement with the ECL. And, if
you went to 74S, Fast or 74AS, you could easily match the
ECL 10K performance. Now, there were a bunch of tricks that
you could use with ECL that helped, like wired-OR instead of
adding a tri-state buffer. ECL had a notable advantage in
1970, but as TTL derivatives continued to advance, that
shrank to nothing.
More information about the cctalk