Turbo C++ 3.0 bugs

mbbrutman-cctalk at brutman.com mbbrutman-cctalk at brutman.com
Wed Dec 14 09:24:22 CST 2005

Quoting 9000 VAX <vax9000 at gmail.com>:

> I met a problem in Watcom C 11.0. I uses wcl which makes 8086 code.
> The code is running on a 386. I got wired result with
> printf("%x %x %x ",inportb(H_ADDR2), inportb(H_ADDR1), inportb(H_ADDR0));
> but the following code worked as expected,
> printf("%x ", inportb(H_ADDR2));
> printf("%x ",inportb(H_ADDR1));
> printf("%x ", inportb(H_ADDR0));
> The hardware is straightforward and unlikely to have problem. I don't
> have time to determine the real source of this problem, though.
> vax, 9000

In general, how is Watcom C 11.0 compared to Turbo C++ 3.0?  Am I hurting myself
unnecessarily using Turbo C++?


More information about the cctech mailing list