How CPU's work (was Re: Hi, I'm new...)
Roy J. Tellason
rtellason at verizon.net
Sun Aug 6 12:21:39 CDT 2006
On Saturday 05 August 2006 11:38 pm, Ethan Dicks wrote:
> On 8/6/06, Ray Arachelian <ray at arachelian.com> wrote:
> > Some CPU's are a pleasure to write in assembly for. These include the
> > 6502's, the Motorla 68000, and SPARC's. Some are a horrible nightmare:
> > the intel chip for example, and to a far far lesser degree, MIPS. It's
> > all a matter of "taste" and experience. But if you want to code for
> > Intel, I highly recommend that you don't look at 68000 code or SPARC
> > code.
> > Because once you see how easy those are when compared to Intel, you'll
> > want to cry that you now have to code in Intel assembly. :-)
> Heh... I've been paid to write 6502, PDP-11, 68000, VAX, and x86
> assembly over the years (mostly in the 80s). I have to agree that the
> x86 was nowhere near as pleasant as any of the others.
It is *so* nice to find others that feel this way... :-)
Member of the toughest, meanest, deadliest, most unrelenting -- and
ablest -- form of life in this section of space, a critter that can
be killed but can't be tamed. --Robert A. Heinlein, "The Puppet Masters"
Information is more dangerous than cannon to a society ruled by lies. --James
More information about the cctech