VX42 Multia versus 3000-300X
Doc Shipley
doc at mdrconsult.com
Wed Jun 14 06:05:31 CDT 2006
Zane H. Healy wrote:
> At 8:05 AM -0400 6/13/06, Doc Shipley wrote:
>
>> Zane H. Healy wrote:
>>
>>> IIRC, that would be another advantage to the 300X, it should be able
>>> to take more RAM than the Multia. HOWEVER, you'd best look into what
>>> kind of RAM it takes and how much it has. Depending on the model, it
>>> might be cheaper to get a better system than to upgrade the RAM. This
>>> is why my AlphaStation 500/333 sits unused with only has 96MB RAM,
>>> and you don't even want to know what I paid for it :^(
>>
>>
>> I'm trying to remember which DEC3000-300 I have. I'm pretty sure
>> it's a 300X, but I'm away and my wife gets irked if I call her to look
>> at model numbers. :)
>>
>> Anyway, it takes regular 36-bit parity, 72-pin SIMMs. The memory in
>> mine came out of an Indigo^2.
>
>
> I believe only one or two models of the 3000 take 72-pin SIMMs. My
> 3000-300LX does, and it's also one of the slowest Alpha's out there. I
> have coworker who has a 3000 and her system uses decidedly non-standard
> RAM.
I sort of remember that all the 3000-300 models take "regular" parity
72-pin. I have a 3000-600 that most certainly doesn't.
Do you find the 300LX to be slower than a Multia (running the
standard 2.5" drive)?
Doc
More information about the cctech
mailing list